Rule 407.        Subsequent Remedial Measures

When, an injury or harm allegedly caused by an event,

measures are taken that, if taken previously, would have

made the injury or harm less likely to occur, evidence of the

subsequent measures is not admissible to prove negligence,

culpable conduct, a defect in a product, a defect in a

productís design, or a need for a warning or instruction.  This

rule does not require the exclusion of evidence of subsequent

measures when offered for another purpose, such as proving

ownership, control, or feasibility of precautionary measures,

if controverted, or impeachment.